Saturday, December 17, 2011
Ernest Brockenberry UBN Project
Final Paper for UBN
Biodiversity and ecology is very important in our live. It helps us live and make our lives much more easier. For example, plants are able to clean the air around us by converting carbon dioxide into oxygen. They can also be converted into useful materials in our everyday lives like paper and medicine. But the plant population and other populations are decreasing every single day. Many forests are being cut down, habitats are being destroyed, humans are releasing a lot of Carbon Dioxide and other harmful chemicals in the air, and there aren’t many trees in urban areas. This is why biodiversity and ecology are important. If we ignore this, many of our resources, like plants, will not be in reach anymore. If there are no resources, we could live a very difficult life, and in the worst circumstances, humanity would be extinct. I chose to do this project to see how much biodiversity there is in a urban place like New York City. To complete this task, I choose different plots around the city and collected data with applications like google maps, google docs, cameras, and spreadsheets. All these applications were used through smart phones and laptops. The smart phones were taken to the plots and with them, data and pictures were collected. We then returned back to the American Museum of Natural History and transferred the data from the phones to the laptops. From there, we were able to organize the data and work with it to see how much biodiversity there was in the plots. We found statistical analysis like abundance, relative abundance, natural log, and much more. This was all done in spreadsheets.
My first plot is where a lot of biodiversity can be found: Central Park. Central park is very diverse and the home to many plants and animals. Central park is a very big place with about 843 acres of land or 6% of Manhattan (source: http://www.centralparknyc.org/visit/general-info/faq/). The plot I chose was a random plot. The plot was mostly grass and some trees. The plot was divided by a cemented road for pedestrians. It was very big. On one side of the plot there is a pond and the Delacorte Theater. On the other side of the plot there are many baseball fields. The plot was mostly grass. There was a plant on the field which is known as the clover (Trifolium spp.). Around the plot there were many birds and squirrels. The plot had a lot of biodiversity and was mostly undisturbed at the time I was there. There was also no predators and the grass was cut so it would not grow very tall.
-This is the picture of the three-leaf clover. (Trifolium spp.)
The second plot was a regular city street. The biodiversity was very low. There were many people walking but the only biodiversity that I found were some trees and very little grass and moss growing in the cracks of the pavement. There were also some dogs but other than that there was not any more biodiversity. The city streets were very boring visually because the biodiversity was very low and there wasn’t much to see. But for data it’s interesting because it shows how humans have affected biodiversity in a negative way by limiting the amount of biodiversity there could be. This picture shows how biodiversity is missing in the city streets.
As you can see, the sidewalk in this area has little biodiversity. There isn’t much to watch and shows how humans have disturbed habitats.
Both Central Park and the city streets have many threats to biodiversity but it is obvious that the city streets have much more problems than Central Park. The only problems that I found in Central Park was the paved walkway that intersected two ecosystems and humans themselves. The paved walkway is a problem because animals could get killed due to walking pedestrians and bicycles. The people walking by is a big problem. Children could destroy the ecosystem by riping off grass or leaves from a tree. Humans could take their pets to the parks. These pets could damage the ecosystems in many ways. The streets present many problems like cars, humans, bicycles, etc.
As I did this experiment, I saw my surroundings in a different way. I realized that biodiversity should be a big concern for every single person in New York City and the world. Many people don’t realize how important biodiversity is. We use a lot of paper, use our electronics, throw out items that can be recycled, litter, and don’t know that this is affecting our environment. We need to know that those resources are possible because of biodiversity. I think that the best way to teach people to take care of biodiversity is to teach young children at a young age to love, care, and appreciate biodiversity. This way, everybody is aware of biodiversity. The city and state should place more trash cans and recycling bins around the city. This way, there would be less trash and many more items could be recycled. It would also be a good idea to make recycling programs around the city to be able to conserve the resources we have. These are good ideas but it wouldn’t help if the community isn’t interested or doesn’t care. I think that that is the biggest problem; many people don’t find a interest in biodiversity. Many people find biodiversity boring and a topic that does not matter. One way the city could make this more interesting is by accepting students helping out with recycling and other activities community service hours. Teens could use this as community service hours. It would benefit them because most schools ask for community service hours and it would also help the community because it preserves and helps save biodiversity. In these ways, biodiversity can be a concern for the world.
Ernest Brockenberry UBN Project
Part 2
Biodiversity Media Project: Blog Post
For this project, I took data regarding the types of life around the streets and parks of the big Apple. I used no rulers nor pipettes, instead, I counted upon tools that were mostly digital, including the HTC Aria, a Macbook, and several apps and programs to the job. Before commencing the study, I decided that it was likely that the there would be not much difference in the species richness between my plots and transects, because this was in an urban environment of over 10,000 people where humans were the dominant species.
My first plot was a 50x50 step plot. Located in the middle of Central Park, over a grassy meadow near the Central Park Oval. The plot, being very large required the use of randomization to analyze. Within it were several trees, many insects, a large mass of grass. We conducted the analyzation by using the website Random.org to produce us with a set of random numbers on our phones. We used those numbers to find the numbers of steps that we should take in order to find random spots throughout our plot. Whenever we can to a stop, we produced a circle on area that we were studying with a piece of string. Then a thorough examination of the area was conducted, sifting through soil, canvassing the trunks of the trees, brushing through the grass. Pictures were taken every section that we can past. In plot one, we came across the two large clusters of mushrooms at the base of a tree, we strongly suspected that although there were well over a hundred caps, the clusters were connected below the ground and were one large colony. Later, the idea of them being honey mushroom fungi emerged. On other trees we also observed many tiny mushrooms that involved deep squinting to fully observe. At some points, there was nothing but grass and weeds, in those spots, the we sifted to uncover organisms, though we came upon none.
The second was a transect that was shared by thousands of New Yorkers and tourists, the very sidewalks of the city. Once again, we called upon the numbers of Random.org, using the numbers generated to figure out the number of steps between each stop where we would take data. At many points, we came to a stop on solid asphalt, and could find organisms visible to the naked eye. The shoes and people wearing them had caused many of the other organisms to leave or get killed. At other stops, we came to a spot where a tree was planted in the asphalt and there we were able to find more organisms. There were trees, and in addition to that there were also various plants growing in the patches of soil that surrounded the tree. Impatiens (Impatiens walleriana) and pansies, (V. tricolor). We also came upon some bright green plants that we suspected were potato vines. At some parts, we stumbled upon planters that were set up by residents and/or store owners. These were not that many in number, and were planted by the dominant species. Here, the dominant species were responsible for controlling the species that were allowed to exist in this area. This went on for several blocks.
These two places were studied on the same day. The temperature fluctuated slightly over the course of the day, from 21-24ºC. However, the arithmetic mean and media were both 22 degrees. The variance was about 0.41 and the standard deviation, σ, roughly 0.64. Please refer to Figure for reference. Our sampling efforts in collecting any data was rather high, as we divided the plots in a large number of randomized sections. After collecting data, we returned and spent time analyzing it. We counted on Google Docs to provide us with fusion tables, spreadsheets, and documents to allow us to make calculations and have them posted. With this, we relied upon spreadsheets mainly to make calculations, such as for finding the Simpson’s Diversity Index and the Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index. The fusion tables provided us with the data we collected, while the documents allowed us to make drafts of our blog posts etc.
It was noted that in at least a couple randomized spots of our plots that the dominant species of humans maintained control of what species were allowed to even exist in New York. The trees had been planted at regular intervals that were regulated by humans. Decorative plants had been picked out for planting. This sort of choosing often either leads to or is the result of invasive species. The potato vine, for example, is native to South America, though it grows in the city of New York among the more indigenous plants. The pansy is another example. Other species were also encouraged or discouraged. There were many people, especially children, chasing after squirrels and feeding pigeons. Even as an act of recreation, the biodiversity was affected by the whims of even the youngest of the dominant species. With this sort of behavior, biodiversity is constantly controlled by humans. For further information, please follow the link to the article Human Domination of Earths Ecosystems, at http://bit.ly/pWE7ht.
The plots had different values for species richness. The plot in Central Park registered eight different divisions on the taxonomic classification. The transect in New York, however, had only five. This demonstrates the way humans are in control of the biodiversity within an urban center such as New York. Central Park is considered one of the most natural places in the city, where one can be surrounded by a more pristine environment on the pristine-urban gradient. Thus, many more of our natural species exist, giving us a wide range of organisms. In sidewalk environment, where the ground is paved and plants are picked, pruned, and weeded by humans, only those picked for their beauty and aesthetic purposes are allowed to grow. Therefore, the organisms are limited to a handful of taxonomic divisions, in contrast with the larger number found in Central Park. The New York City and State governments should put greater emphasis on the biodiversity in New York. We live in a place where urban biodiversity is key to our success and survival as humans, and the government should place greater emphasis on the conduction of studies that track urban biodiversity in this way.
Media Project: Blog Post
For this project, I took data regarding the types of life around the streets and parks of the big Apple. I used no rulers nor pipettes, instead, I counted upon tools that were mostly digital, including the HTC Aria, a Macbook, and several apps and programs to the job. Before commencing the study, I decided that it was likely that the there would be not much difference in the species richness between my plots and transects, because this was in an urban environment of over 10,000 people where humans were the dominant species.
My first plot was a 50x50 step plot. Located in the middle of Central Park, over a grassy meadow near the Central Park Oval. The plot, being very large required the use of randomization to analyze. Within it were several trees, many insects, a large mass of grass. We conducted the analyzation by using the website Random.org to produce us with a set of random numbers on our phones. We used those numbers to find the numbers of steps that we should take in order to find random spots throughout our plot. Whenever we can to a stop, we produced a circle on area that we were studying with a piece of string. Then a thorough examination of the area was conducted, sifting through soil, canvassing the trunks of the trees, brushing through the grass. Pictures were taken every section that we can past. In plot one, we came across the two large clusters of mushrooms at the base of a tree, we strongly suspected that although there were well over a hundred caps, the clusters were connected below the ground and were one large colony. Later, the idea of them being honey mushroom fungi emerged. On other trees we also observed many tiny mushrooms that involved deep squinting to fully observe. At some points, there was nothing but grass and weeds, in those spots, the we sifted to uncover organisms, though we came upon none.
The second was a transect that was shared by thousands of New Yorkers and tourists, the very sidewalks of the city. Once again, we called upon the numbers of Random.org, using the numbers generated to figure out the number of steps between each stop where we would take data. At many points, we came to a stop on solid asphalt, and could find organisms visible to the naked eye. The shoes and people wearing them had caused many of the other organisms to leave or get killed. At other stops, we came to a spot where a tree was planted in the asphalt and there we were able to find more organisms. There were trees, and in addition to that there were also various plants growing in the patches of soil that surrounded the tree. Impatiens (Impatiens walleriana) and pansies, (V. tricolor). We also came upon some bright green plants that we suspected were potato vines. At some parts, we stumbled upon planters that were set up by residents and/or store owners. These were not that many in number, and were planted by the dominant species. Here, the dominant species were responsible for controlling the species that were allowed to exist in this area. This went on for several blocks.
These two places were studied on the same day. The temperature fluctuated slightly over the course of the day, from 21-24ºC. However, the arithmetic mean and media were both 22 degrees. The variance was about 0.41 and the standard deviation, σ, roughly 0.64. Please refer to Figure for reference. Our sampling efforts in collecting any data was rather high, as we divided the plots in a large number of randomized sections. After collecting data, we returned and spent time analyzing it. We counted on Google Docs to provide us with fusion tables, spreadsheets, and documents to allow us to make calculations and have them posted. With this, we relied upon spreadsheets mainly to make calculations, such as for finding the Simpson’s Diversity Index and the Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index. The fusion tables provided us with the data we collected, while the documents allowed us to make drafts of our blog posts etc.
It was noted that in at least a couple randomized spots of our plots that the dominant species of humans maintained control of what species were allowed to even exist in New York. The trees had been planted at regular intervals that were regulated by humans. Decorative plants had been picked out for planting. This sort of choosing often either leads to or is the result of invasive species. The potato vine, for example, is native to South America, though it grows in the city of New York among the more indigenous plants. The pansy is another example. Other species were also encouraged or discouraged. There were many people, especially children, chasing after squirrels and feeding pigeons. Even as an act of recreation, the biodiversity was affected by the whims of even the youngest of the dominant species. With this sort of behavior, biodiversity is constantly controlled by humans. For further information, please follow the link to the article Human Domination of Earths Ecosystems, at http://bit.ly/pWE7ht.
The plots had different values for species richness. The plot in Central Park registered eight different divisions on the taxonomic classification. The transect in New York, however, had only five. This demonstrates the way humans are in control of the biodiversity within an urban center such as New York. Central Park is considered one of the most natural places in the city, where one can be surrounded by a more pristine environment on the pristine-urban gradient. Thus, many more of our natural species exist, giving us a wide range of organisms. In sidewalk environment, where the ground is paved and plants are picked, pruned, and weeded by humans, only those picked for their beauty and aesthetic purposes are allowed to grow. Therefore, the organisms are limited to a handful of taxonomic divisions, in contrast with the larger number found in Central Park. The New York City and State governments should put greater emphasis on the biodiversity in New York. We live in a place where urban biodiversity is key to our success and survival as humans, and the government should place greater emphasis on the conduction of studies that track urban biodiversity in this way.
Saturday, December 3, 2011
Trying to calculate the Simpsons or Shannon-Weaver Diversity index
1. Go to http://bit.ly/biodiversityindexcalculators
2. Look for the file title Biodiversity Diversity Index Calculator on the upper left hand side of your screen.
3. Just below the 'B' in file title click and hold down the mouse clicker on the word 'File'
4. Next scroll to the words 'Make a copy'
5. Release the mouse.
6. Rename your copy of the calculators by adding your First name so that the file reads 'First Name - Biodiversity Diversity Index Calculator
7. Now you are ready to use the file! :-)
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Houses fronted by more street trees experienced lower crime rates than houses without street trees.
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
You are part of a network. Get involved and share!
Saturday, November 19, 2011
My Project (2/3 of the way done)
- The first plot that I observed in Central Park, right next to the Delacorte Theater. The are was very grassy, and had many trees. There weren’t very many animals in the plot. There were mostly dogs and people, which I couldn’t use, unfortunately. I was still able to get a good amount of information because there were some invertebrates crawling around in the grass and flying through the air next to the plot.
- The second plot that I observed was really a transect. It consisted of about 3 blocks of a consistent sidewalk. Most of the pictures that I was able to take were of concrete, or, the rare times that I got lucky, it was a patch of grass with a bush or a tree. This transect of data made me pretty upset because most of the areas that I looked at had no living organisms on or in them, besides trees or leaves, of course.
- The link below will direct you to an article by K. Tzoulas and P. James about the link between human well being, social and economical, and urban biodiversity:
Biodiversity Media Project: Blog Post
In the summer of 2011 at the American Museum I studied urban biodiversity. Urban biodiversity is the study of how biodiversity is in a densely populated area such as New York City. It is very important to know about the life that resides next to one’s own. For this project, I took data regarding the types of life around the streets and parks of the big Apple. I used no rulers nor pipettes, instead, I counted upon tools that were mostly digital, including the HTC Aria, a Macbook, and several apps and programs to the job. Before commencing the study, I decided that it was likely that the there would be not much difference in the species richness between my plots and transects, because this was in an urban environment of over 10,000 people where humans were the dominant species.
My first plot was a 50x50 step plot. Located in the middle of Central Park, over a grassy meadow near the Central Park Oval. The plot, being very large required the use of randomization to analyze. Within it were several trees, many insects, a large mass of grass. We conducted the analyzation by using the website Random.org to produce us with a set of random numbers on our phones. We used those numbers to find the numbers of steps that we should take in order to find random spots throughout our plot. Whenever we can to a stop, we produced a circle on area that we were studying with a piece of string. Then a thorough examination of the area was conducted, sifting through soil, canvassing the trunks of the trees, brushing through the grass. Pictures were taken every section that we can past. In plot one, we came across the two large clusters of mushrooms at the base of a tree, we strongly suspected that although there were well over a hundred caps, the clusters were connected below the ground and were one large colony. Later, the idea of them being honey mushroom fungi emerged. On other trees we also observed many tiny mushrooms that involved deep squinting to fully observe. At some points, there was nothing but grass and weeds, in those spots, the we sifted to uncover organisms, though we came upon none.
The second was a transect that was shared by thousands of New Yorkers and tourists, the very sidewalks of the city. Once again, we called upon the numbers of Random.org, using the numbers generated to figure out the number of steps between each stop where we would take data. At many points, we came to a stop on solid asphalt, and could find organisms visible to the naked eye. The shoes and people wearing them had caused many of the other organisms to leave or get killed. At other stops, we came to a spot where a tree was planted in the asphalt and there we were able to find more organisms. There were trees, and in addition to that there were also various plants growing in the patches of soil that surrounded the tree. Impatiens (Impatiens walleriana) and pansies, (V. tricolor). We also identified some bright green vines that we suspected were potato vines
Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index: Shannon-Weaver Index combines the number of species present and evenness into a single index: D = -Σ pi ln pi
University of Hawaiʻi at Manoa Biology 301 & 301L Marine Ecology and Evolution and Center for Earth and Environmental Science Indiana University ~ Purdue University, Indianapolis ARBOR Project - BIRD BIODIVERSITY
- ni The number of individuals in species i; the abundance of species i.
- S The number of species. Also called species richness.
- N The total number of all individuals
- pi The relative abundance of each species, calculated as the proportion of individuals of a given species to the total number of individuals in the community:
Link
-Hollis
http://bit.ly/rPlVBI
Saturday, November 5, 2011
My Project
This is my project so far... disregard the last page please!
In the summer of 2011 at the American Museum I studied urban biodiversity. Urban biodiversity is the study of how biodiversity is in a densely populated area such as New York City. It is very important to know about the life that resides next to one’s own. For this project, I took data regarding the types of life around the streets and parks of the big Apple. I used no rulers nor pipettes, instead, I counted upon tools that were mostly digital, including the HTC Aria, a Macbook, and several apps and programs to the job. Before commencing the study, I decided that it was likely that the there would be not much difference in the species richness between my plots and transects, because this was in an urban environment of over 10,000 people where humans were the dominant species.
My first plot was a 50x50 step plot. Located in the middle of Central Park, over a grassy meadow near the Central Park Oval. The plot, being very large required the use of randomization to analyze. Within it were several trees, many insects, a large mass of grass. We conducted the analyzation by using the website Random.org to produce us with a set of random numbers on our phones. We used those numbers to find the numbers of steps that we should take in order to find random spots throughout our plot. Whenever we can to a stop, we produced a circle on area that we were studying with a piece of string. Then a thorough examination of the area was conducted, sifting through soil, canvassing the trunks of the trees, brushing through the grass. Pictures were taken every section that we can past. In plot one, we came across the two large clusters of mushrooms at the base of a tree, we strongly suspected that although there were well over a hundred caps, the clusters were connected below the ground and were one large colony. Later, the idea of them being honey mushroom fungi emerged. On other trees we also observed many tiny mushrooms that involved deep squinting to fully observe. At some points, there was nothing but grass and weeds, in those spots, the we sifted to uncover organisms, though we came upon none.
Progress For Movie Project
- Information about biodiversity
- A few clips from my plot
- An interesting clip of a sign of animal life in my plot
- The length so far is 3:04
- Background information on where my plot is located.
Biodiversity Media Project: Blog Post
In the summer of 2011 at the American Museum I studied urban biodiversity. Urban biodiversity is the study of how biodiversity is in a densely populated area such as New York City. It is very important to know about the life that resides next to one’s own. For this project, I took data regarding the types of life around the streets and parks of the big Apple. I used no rulers nor pipettes, instead, I counted upon tools that were mostly digital, including the HTC Aria, a Macbook, and several apps and programs to the job. Before commencing the study, I decided that it was likely that the there would be not much difference in the species richness between my plots and transects, because this was in an urban environment of over 10,000 people where humans were the dominant species.
My first plot was a 50x50 step plot. Located in the middle of Central Park, over a grassy meadow near the Central Park Oval. The plot, being very large required the use of randomization to analyze. Within it were several trees, many insects, a large mass of grass. We conducted the analyzation by using the website Random.org to produce us with a set of random numbers on our phones. We used those numbers to find the numbers of steps that we should take in order to find random spots throughout our plot. Whenever we can to a stop, we produced a circle on area that we were studying with a piece of string. Then a thorough examination of the area was conducted, sifting through soil, canvassing the trunks of the trees, brushing through the grass. Pictures were taken every section that we can past. In plot one, we came across the two large clusters of mushrooms at the base of a tree, we strongly suspected that although there were well over a hundred caps, the clusters were connected below the ground and were one large colony. Later, the idea of them being honey mushroom fungi emerged.
Saturday, October 22, 2011
Midway point
This is my halfway point of my project. It is not the complete thing but sort of a detailed outline that I will add to once it is finished
CLASSIFIED NAME Biodiversity Media Project 10/1/11
Urban Biodiversity and ecology are very important to the non-human population of an urban environment. Without a diverse environment, all plant and animal life would die out, as all life is dependent on each other. I chose to do this research team because I was interested in learning more about biodiversity and learning about the new technology that we would be using to collect and analyze data. This technology included HTC phones, forums, and Google spreadsheets. We would observe the plots of land in Theodore Roosevelt Park which we had chosen, and then enter the data into a Google spreadsheet. My null hypothesis was that the diversity in plot one was no different than the diversity in plot two.
Plot one was an open area with three trees, an oak and two unidentified trees. There was an abundance of grass and clover taking up the majority of the open space in the middle of the plot. Along the outside of the plot were various shrubbery and small plants. These organisms were obviously planted in an attempt to make the park look nice. There was also a large abundance of birds, and a few invertebrates and mammals. I estimated that there were 8 plant species, 1 species of fungi, 1 mammal species, 5 bird species, and one species of invertebrates. A major part of this plot was a hose that was connected to the building just behind the plot. It had a slight leak and made a puddle of water that was quite large. This puddle was the reason for the high number of birds there, since all of the organisms there, mammals or birds, used the puddle to drink. I think that this small puddle was comparable to an African watering hole or a suburban mall, as every member of the environment was “hanging out” there. Without this excellent resource in the plot, I do not belive that the biodiversity would have been as impressive. As far as my hypothesis went, I knew that the other plot was going to have to be very impressive in order to match up to this one and prove my hypothesis correct.
Plot 2 was also an open area with one tree, an abundance of grass and clovers taking up the larger part of the open space